Jim Starks vs. Andy Sullivan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Starks posted the stronger offensive profile against Andy Sullivan. Jim Starks posted stronger numbers in OPS (.755 vs .500) and slugging (.414 vs .000). Andy Sullivan had the advantage in on-base percentage (.500 vs .341). By the career numbers, Jim Starks had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Starks and Andy Sullivan
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
184
161.17
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
685
600
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.775
0.775
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
91.42
80.08
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
29.73
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
230
201.46
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
96.92
84.89
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
68.03
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
114.17
114.17
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
1
0.88
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Starks and Andy Sullivan
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
182
1.21
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
2.25
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
4076
27
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
27
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
1358.2
9
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
9
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
1395
9.24
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
1367
9.06
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
4.5
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.99
97.99
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.511
7.511
Andy Sullivan
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2