Nate Smith vs. Jim Tray — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Nate Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Tray. Nate Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (.697 vs .634) and on-base percentage (.364 vs .348). Jim Tray had the advantage in batting average (.286 vs .222). By the career numbers, Nate Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Nate Smith and Jim Tray
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Tray
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.727
0.727
Jim Tray
Career
Per 600 PA
0.652
0.652
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
Jim Tray
Career
Per 600 PA
0.348
0.348
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Tray
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.247
0.247
Jim Tray
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.714
0.714
Jim Tray
Career
Per 600 PA
0.533
0.533
Fielding Stats for Nate Smith and Jim Tray
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.13
Jim Tray
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.06
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
6.75
Jim Tray
Career
Per 9 Innings
55
9.71
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
6.75
Jim Tray
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
8.82
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Tray
Career
Per 9 Innings
90.91
90.91