Ed Sherling vs. Mac Williamson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Sherling posted the stronger offensive profile against Mac Williamson. Ed Sherling posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.500 vs .631) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .283). Mac Williamson had the advantage in home run production (17 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Ed Sherling had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Sherling and Mac Williamson
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
4
1200
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
160
198.76
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
483
600
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.647
0.647
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
28
34.78
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.71
212.28
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
45.42
56.42
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
151
187.58
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
300
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
136
168.94
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.282
0.282
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.348
0.348
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.145
0.145
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.475
0.475
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.562
0.562
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
84
104.35
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.68
203.37
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
41.76
51.88
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
3.47
3.47
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Mac Williamson
Career
Per 600 PA
11
13.66