Jim Scranton vs. Chick Shorten — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Chick Shorten posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Scranton. Chick Shorten posted stronger numbers in OPS (.680 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.330 vs .000). By the career numbers, Chick Shorten had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Scranton and Chick Shorten
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 600 PA
8
800
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
527
208.3
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
1518
600
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 600 PA
1
100
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
292
115.42
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 600 PA
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
22.32
22.32
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Scranton and Chick Shorten
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
3.32
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 9 Innings
352
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
4.74
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 9 Innings
652
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
4.74
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 9 Innings
642
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.47
Jim Scranton
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.429
1.429
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.824