Pat Scanlon vs. Rip Wade — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Pat Scanlon and Rip Wade are closely matched on the surface stats. Rip Wade posted stronger numbers in OPS (.690 vs .625) and slugging (.406 vs .333). Pat Scanlon had the advantage in on-base percentage (.292 vs .284). By the career numbers, Rip Wade had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pat Scanlon and Rip Wade
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.708
0.708
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.406
0.406
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.042
0.042
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.471
0.471
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 600 PA
2.68
67.05
Rip Wade
Career
Per 600 PA
8.78
68.38
Fielding Stats for Pat Scanlon and Rip Wade
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
0.98
Rip Wade
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
80
80
Rip Wade
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.67
Pat Scanlon
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.333
1.333
Rip Wade
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.526