Ed Samcoff vs. Chick Shorten — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Chick Shorten posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Samcoff. Chick Shorten posted stronger numbers in OPS (.680 vs .083) and on-base percentage (.330 vs .083). By the career numbers, Chick Shorten had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Samcoff and Chick Shorten
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
1518
600
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
0.706
0.706
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.01
0.5
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
161.11
63.68
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.038
0.038
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
0.603
0.603
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
22.32
22.32
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 600 PA
1.62
1.62
Fielding Stats for Ed Samcoff and Chick Shorten
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 9 Innings
352
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.47
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.333
Chick Shorten
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.824