John Rudderham vs. Leo Smith — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, John Rudderham and Leo Smith are closely matched on the surface stats. Leo Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (.533 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.283 vs .250). John Rudderham had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .188). By the career numbers, Leo Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Rudderham and Leo Smith
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
127
600
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.569
0.569
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
34.02
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
9.34
44.15
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.484
0.484
John Rudderham
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
45.21
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
10.28
48.59
Fielding Stats for John Rudderham and Leo Smith
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
1.07
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
27
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
882
27
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
9
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
294
9
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.8
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
191
5.85
John Rudderham
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.76
94.76