Jim Roxburgh vs. Greg Tabor — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Roxburgh posted the stronger offensive profile against Greg Tabor. Jim Roxburgh posted stronger numbers in OPS (.607 vs .333) and on-base percentage (.357 vs .111). By the career numbers, Jim Roxburgh had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Roxburgh and Greg Tabor
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.643
0.643
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1.21
51.67
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.23
15.48
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.223
0.223
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.106
0.106
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
14
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 600 PA
2.25
2.25
Fielding Stats for Jim Roxburgh and Greg Tabor
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.5
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.64
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
8.4
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
6.55
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
6.9
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
6.14
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
82.14
82.14
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.75
93.75
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.6
4.6
Greg Tabor
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.75
3.75