Jim Robertson vs. Ed Samcoff — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Robertson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Samcoff. Jim Robertson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.539 vs .083) and on-base percentage (.300 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim Robertson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Robertson and Ed Samcoff
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
182
600
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.58
0.58
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
12.51
41.25
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.01
0.5
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.195
0.195
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.038
0.038
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.484
0.484
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
6.74
6.74
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.89
0.89
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 600 PA
2
6.59
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim Robertson and Ed Samcoff
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 9 Innings
54
1.21
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 9 Innings
241
5.42
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 9 Innings
235
5.29
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.51
97.51
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Jim Robertson
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.352
4.352
Ed Samcoff
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.333