Jim Ritz vs. Lane Thomas — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Lane Thomas posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Ritz. Lane Thomas posted stronger numbers in OPS (.728 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.309 vs .200). By the career numbers, Lane Thomas had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Ritz and Lane Thomas
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.469
0.469
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 600 PA
0.754
0.754
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 600 PA
0.309
0.309
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
0.09
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.06
7.11
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 600 PA
269.5
71.93
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
1
120
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 600 PA
99
26.42
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 600 PA
71.72
71.72
Fielding Stats for Jim Ritz and Lane Thomas
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 9 Innings
591
1.19
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
3.6
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 9 Innings
1191
2.39
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 9 Innings
1172
2.36
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
75
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.4
98.4
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Lane Thomas
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.983
1.983