Jim Ritz vs. Moe Thacker — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Moe Thacker posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Ritz. Moe Thacker posted stronger numbers in OPS (.536 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.309 vs .200). By the career numbers, Moe Thacker had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Ritz and Moe Thacker
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.469
0.469
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.557
0.557
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
0.09
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.187
0.187
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.06
7.11
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
17.66
34.97
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
33.33
33.33
Fielding Stats for Jim Ritz and Moe Thacker
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 9 Innings
152
1.71
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
3.6
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 9 Innings
577
6.51
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 9 Innings
568
6.41
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
75
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.44
98.44
Jim Ritz
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
3
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.737
3.737