Jim Riley vs. Moe Thacker — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Moe Thacker posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Riley. Moe Thacker posted stronger numbers in OPS (.536 vs .176) and on-base percentage (.309 vs .176). By the career numbers, Moe Thacker had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Riley and Moe Thacker
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
6
211.76
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
158
312.87
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.265
0.265
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.557
0.557
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.177
0.177
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.079
0.079
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.187
0.187
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.457
0.457
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
5.67
5.67
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
3.74
3.74
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.49
0.49
Jim Riley
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 600 PA
7
13.86
Fielding Stats for Jim Riley and Moe Thacker
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 9 Innings
152
1.71
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 9 Innings
568
6.41
Jim Riley
Career
Per 9 Innings
85.71
Moe Thacker
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.44
98.44