Al Richter vs. Dallas Williams — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Al Richter posted the stronger offensive profile against Dallas Williams. Al Richter posted stronger numbers in OPS (.377 vs .225) and on-base percentage (.286 vs .146). By the career numbers, Al Richter had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Al Richter and Dallas Williams
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
6
257.14
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
20
279.07
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
43
600
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.079
0.079
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.464
0.464
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.291
0.291
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
4
171.43
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
6
83.72
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.146
0.146
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.079
0.079
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.151
0.151
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.086
0.086
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.094
0.094
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
1
42.86
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
3
41.86
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.48
-20.76
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.79
-10.97
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
7.17
7.17
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Al Richter and Dallas Williams
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.71
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
2.5
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
2.5
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
Dallas Williams
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.462
1.462