John Raynor vs. Leo Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Leo Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against John Raynor. Leo Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (.533 vs .473) and on-base percentage (.283 vs .273). John Raynor had the advantage in batting average (.200 vs .188). By the career numbers, Leo Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John Raynor and Leo Smith
John Raynor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
John Raynor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.569
0.569
John Raynor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
John Raynor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.173
0.173
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
John Raynor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.484
0.484
John Raynor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.69
37.8
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
10.28
48.59
Fielding Stats for John Raynor and Leo Smith
John Raynor
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
5.06
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
1.07
John Raynor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
3.38
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
191
5.85
John Raynor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
3.38
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
181
5.54
John Raynor
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.76
94.76
John Raynor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.667
0.667
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.171
5.171