Jim Pruett vs. Ed Sicking — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim Pruett and Ed Sicking are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim Pruett posted stronger numbers in OPS (.606 vs .532) and on-base percentage (.375 vs .277). Ed Sicking had the advantage in slugging (.255 vs .231). By the career numbers, Jim Pruett had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Pruett and Ed Sicking
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.618
0.618
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.571
0.571
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.445
0.445
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
1.07
40.13
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
51.92
47.63
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
8
8
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
15.21
15.21
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.91
0.91
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 600 PA
1
37.5
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
19
17.43
Fielding Stats for Jim Pruett and Ed Sicking
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
195
Jim Pruett
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.36