Unknown Proctor vs. Jim Small — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .318). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Unknown Proctor and Jim Small
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
108
423.53
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
153
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.665
0.665
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
48
188.24
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
16.29
63.9
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
6.95
6.95
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Small
Career
Per 600 PA
2
7.84
Fielding Stats for Unknown Proctor and Jim Small
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
45
1.54
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
27
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
789
27
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.1
9
Jim Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
263
9