Unknown Proctor vs. Charlie Small — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .250). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Unknown Proctor and Charlie Small
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
25
681.82
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
22
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.582
0.582
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
1.32
36.05
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
5
136.36
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0.168
0.168
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
1.23
33.59
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
4.4
4.4
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Charlie Small
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Unknown Proctor and Charlie Small
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86
Charlie Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Charlie Small
Career
Per 9 Innings
0