Dan Porter vs. Ed Sicking — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Sicking posted the stronger offensive profile against Dan Porter. Ed Sicking posted stronger numbers in OPS (.532 vs .496) and slugging (.255 vs .211). Dan Porter had the advantage in on-base percentage (.286 vs .277). By the career numbers, Ed Sicking had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dan Porter and Ed Sicking
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
13
371.43
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
203
186.24
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.524
0.524
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.571
0.571
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
6
171.43
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
177
162.39
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.181
0.181
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.445
0.445
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
1.52
43.35
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
51.92
47.63
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
5.25
5.25
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
15.21
15.21
Dan Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.91
0.91
Fielding Stats for Dan Porter and Ed Sicking
Dan Porter
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
195
Dan Porter
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.36