Jim Poole vs. Ed Sicking — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Poole posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Sicking. Jim Poole posted stronger numbers in OPS (.748 vs .532) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .277). By the career numbers, Jim Poole had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Poole and Ed Sicking
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
283
165.18
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
203
186.24
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
1028
600
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
654
600
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.761
0.761
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.571
0.571
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
130.01
75.88
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
44.85
41.15
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
334
194.94
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
177
162.39
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.415
0.415
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.127
0.127
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.029
0.029
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.683
0.683
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.445
0.445
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
142.12
82.95
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
51.92
47.63
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
15.12
15.12
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
15.21
15.21
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.87
0.87
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
0.91
0.91
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
16
9.34
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
19
17.43
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
56.25
56.25
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 600 PA
73.68
73.68
Fielding Stats for Jim Poole and Ed Sicking
Jim Poole
Career
Per 9 Innings
256
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
195
Jim Poole
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.67
Ed Sicking
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.36