Jim Poole vs. Al Richter — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Poole posted the stronger offensive profile against Al Richter. Jim Poole posted stronger numbers in OPS (.748 vs .377) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .286). By the career numbers, Jim Poole had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Poole and Al Richter
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.761
0.761
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.464
0.464
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.415
0.415
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.151
0.151
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0.683
0.683
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
15.12
15.12
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim Poole
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
Fielding Stats for Jim Poole and Al Richter
Jim Poole
Career
Per 9 Innings
256
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Jim Poole
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.67
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
100