Shannon Penn vs. Al Richter — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Shannon Penn and Al Richter are closely matched on the surface stats. Shannon Penn posted stronger numbers in slugging (.174 vs .091) and batting average (.174 vs .091). Al Richter had the advantage in on-base percentage (.286 vs .208). By the career numbers, Shannon Penn had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Shannon Penn and Al Richter
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 600 PA
24
600
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.396
0.396
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.464
0.464
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.208
0.208
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.137
0.137
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.151
0.151
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 600 PA
0.238
0.238
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 600 PA
2
50
Al Richter
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
Fielding Stats for Shannon Penn and Al Richter
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.8
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
8.55
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
Shannon Penn
Career
Per 9 Innings
86.36
86.36
Al Richter
Career
Per 9 Innings
100