Tom Payne vs. Nate Smith — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Tom Payne and Nate Smith are closely matched on the surface stats. Tom Payne posted stronger numbers in slugging (.400 vs .333) and batting average (.260 vs .222). Nate Smith had the advantage in on-base percentage (.364 vs .302). By the career numbers, Tom Payne had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tom Payne and Nate Smith
Tom Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.26
0.26
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Tom Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.728
0.728
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.727
0.727
Tom Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tom Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.302
0.302
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
Tom Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Tom Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.247
0.247
Tom Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.622
0.622
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.714
0.714
Tom Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
7.03
74.02
Nate Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.27
69.01
Fielding Stats for Tom Payne and Nate Smith
Tom Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
1.23
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.13
Tom Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.07
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.13
Tom Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
1.92
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
6.75
Tom Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
1.84
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
6.75
Tom Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
96
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tom Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
87.5
87.5
Nate Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100