Gil Patterson vs. Walter Zink — Career Comparison

Gil Patterson built a career as a starting pitcher and Walter Zink as a reliever — different jobs with different demands — but on the metrics that apply to both, a comparison is still worth making. Walter Zink posted stronger surface numbers — ERA 2.25 and WHIP 1.750 compared to 5.4 and 1.770 for Gil Patterson. By the career numbers, Walter Zink had the better of this cross-role comparison — though era context would sharpen the verdict.