Dixie Parsons vs. Jim Thurman — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Dixie Parsons posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Thurman. Dixie Parsons posted stronger numbers in OPS (.449 vs .143) and on-base percentage (.229 vs .143). By the career numbers, Dixie Parsons had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dixie Parsons and Jim Thurman
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
108
201.87
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
3
257.14
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
321
600
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
7
600
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.479
0.479
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
14.02
26.21
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.02
1.54
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
72
134.58
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
1
85.71
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.158
0.158
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.064
0.064
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
8.23
8.23
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
10
18.69
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Dixie Parsons and Jim Thurman
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
106
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
2.4
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
518
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
3
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.92
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.887
Jim Thurman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.25
1.25