Dixie Parker vs. Jim Starks — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Starks posted the stronger offensive profile against Dixie Parker. Jim Starks posted stronger numbers in OPS (.755 vs .400) and on-base percentage (.341 vs .200). By the career numbers, Jim Starks had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dixie Parker and Jim Starks
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
685
600
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.775
0.775
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
21.64
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
91.42
80.08
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.414
0.414
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
0.732
0.732
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
21.95
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
96.92
84.89
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
114.17
114.17
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Starks
Career
Per 600 PA
1
0.88
Fielding Stats for Dixie Parker and Jim Starks
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
182
1.21
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
1395
9.24
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
1367
9.06
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.99
97.99
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.5
Jim Starks
Career
Per 9 Innings
7.511
7.511