John O'Neil vs. John Scott — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, John O'Neil and John Scott are closely matched on the surface stats. John Scott posted stronger numbers in OPS (.671 vs .601) and on-base percentage (.379 vs .303). John O'Neil had the advantage in batting average (.266 vs .250). By the career numbers, John Scott had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John O'Neil and John Scott
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
46
273.27
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
8
165.52
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
101
600
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
29
600
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.619
0.619
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.733
0.733
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.12
0.12
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
30
178.22
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
11
227.59
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.303
0.303
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.379
0.379
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.298
0.298
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.032
0.032
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.042
0.042
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0.478
0.478
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.722
0.722
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
10.25
60.87
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
3.82
79
John O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
8.42
8.42
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for John O'Neil and John Scott
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
32
John Scott
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
John O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.03
John Scott
Career
Per 9 Innings
80