Luther O'Neal vs. A. Smith — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Luther O'Neal and A. Smith are closely matched on the surface stats. A. Smith posted stronger numbers in slugging (.250 vs .234) and batting average (.250 vs .203). Luther O'Neal had the advantage in on-base percentage (.261 vs .250). By the career numbers, A. Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Luther O'Neal and A. Smith
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
A. Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
A. Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
A. Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
A. Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.176
0.176
A. Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
0.451
0.451
A. Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 600 PA
5.07
43.43
A. Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
40.39
Fielding Stats for Luther O'Neal and A. Smith
Luther O'Neal
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
1.38
A. Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
2