Jim Olander vs. Dixie Parsons — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Dixie Parsons posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim Olander. Dixie Parsons posted stronger numbers in OPS (.449 vs .182) and on-base percentage (.229 vs .182). By the career numbers, Dixie Parsons had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim Olander and Dixie Parsons
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
12
654.55
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
108
201.87
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
11
600
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
321
600
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.479
0.479
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.05
2.6
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
14.02
26.21
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
2
109.09
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
72
134.58
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.082
0.082
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.158
0.158
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
0.34
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
2
109.09
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
23
42.99
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
2.2
2.2
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
8.23
8.23
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
0.51
0.51
Jim Olander
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 600 PA
10
18.69
Fielding Stats for Jim Olander and Dixie Parsons
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
2.89
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
106
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
2.89
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
529
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
2.89
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
518
Jim Olander
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dixie Parsons
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.92