Paul O'Dea vs. John Scott — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Paul O'Dea posted the stronger offensive profile against John Scott. Paul O'Dea posted stronger numbers in slugging (.317 vs .292) and batting average (.272 vs .250). John Scott had the advantage in on-base percentage (.379 vs .345). By the career numbers, Paul O'Dea had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Paul O'Dea and John Scott
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.693
0.693
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.733
0.733
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.131
0.131
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
151
202.23
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
11
227.59
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.345
0.345
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.379
0.379
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.046
0.046
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.042
0.042
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
0.561
0.561
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.722
0.722
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
21
28.12
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
7
9.38
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
1
20.69
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 600 PA
71.43
71.43
John Scott
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Paul O'Dea and John Scott
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 9 Innings
101
John Scott
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
Paul O'Dea
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.33
John Scott
Career
Per 9 Innings
80