John O'Connell vs. Dan Tye — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, John O'Connell and Dan Tye are closely matched on the surface stats. Dan Tye posted stronger numbers in slugging (.267 vs .250) and batting average (.200 vs .125). John O'Connell had the advantage in on-base percentage (.222 vs .200). By the career numbers, Dan Tye had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John O'Connell and Dan Tye
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.467
0.467
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.222
0.222
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.067
0.067
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.163
0.163
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.157
0.157
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John O'Connell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
22.13
Dan Tye
Career
Per 600 PA
0.71
28.42
Fielding Stats for John O'Connell and Dan Tye
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Dan Tye
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.25
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Dan Tye
Career
Per 9 Innings
85.71
85.71
John O'Connell
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.333
Dan Tye
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.2
1.2