Nick Noonan vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Nick Noonan. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .488) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .253). Nick Noonan had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Nick Noonan and Jim Smith
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.49
0.49
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.239
0.239
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.041
0.041
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.166
0.166
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.358
0.358
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 600 PA
7.34
28.43
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Nick Noonan and Jim Smith
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1.71
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
0.9
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 9 Innings
145
4.68
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 9 Innings
142
4.58
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.93
97.93
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.679
2.679
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Nick Noonan
Career
Per 9 Innings
52.83
52.83
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100