Henry Nears vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Henry Nears. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .833) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .417). Henry Nears had the advantage in batting average (.417 vs .333). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Henry Nears and Jim Smith
Henry Nears
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Henry Nears
Career
Per 600 PA
0.833
0.833
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Henry Nears
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Henry Nears
Career
Per 600 PA
0.417
0.417
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Henry Nears
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Henry Nears
Career
Per 600 PA
0.714
0.714
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Henry Nears
Career
Per 600 PA
2.42
121.13
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Henry Nears and Jim Smith
Henry Nears
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.96
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Henry Nears
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.98
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Henry Nears
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.45
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Henry Nears
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.45
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Henry Nears
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Henry Nears
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
50
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100