Joe Nealon vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Joe Nealon. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .658) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .317). Joe Nealon had the advantage in home run production (3 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Joe Nealon and Jim Smith
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.256
0.256
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
0.7
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
111.86
63.86
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.342
0.342
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.085
0.085
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
0.228
0.228
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
124.32
70.97
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 600 PA
10.95
10.95
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Joe Nealon and Jim Smith
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 9 Innings
258
1.02
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 9 Innings
258
1.02
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 9 Innings
2807
11.11
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 9 Innings
2760
10.92
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.33
98.33
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 9 Innings
10.698
10.698
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Joe Nealon
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100