Connie Murphy vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Hal Quick posted the stronger offensive profile against Connie Murphy. Hal Quick posted stronger numbers in OPS (.547 vs .408) and on-base percentage (.279 vs .217). By the career numbers, Hal Quick had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Connie Murphy and Hal Quick
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
7
182.61
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
23
600
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
600
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.435
0.435
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
1
26.09
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
1
13.95
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
5
130.43
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.217
0.217
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.048
0.048
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.024
0.024
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.146
0.146
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.72
18.76
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
3.12
43.54
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
7.67
7.67
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
43
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0.67
0.67
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
27.91
Fielding Stats for Connie Murphy and Hal Quick
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.25
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Connie Murphy
Career
Per 9 Innings
85.71
85.71
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73