Jose Munoz vs. Dan Norman — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jose Munoz and Dan Norman are closely matched on the surface stats. Dan Norman posted stronger numbers in OPS (.653 vs .614) and slugging (.362 vs .259). Jose Munoz had the advantage in on-base percentage (.355 vs .291). By the career numbers, Dan Norman had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jose Munoz and Dan Norman
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
17
329.03
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
192
303.16
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.645
0.645
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.678
0.678
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
11
212.9
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
109
172.11
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.355
0.355
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.287
0.287
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.362
0.362
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.225
0.225
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.22
0.22
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.601
0.601
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
2.85
55.17
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
40.08
63.28
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
31
31
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.38
0.38
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 600 PA
2
38.71
Dan Norman
Career
Per 600 PA
3
4.74
Fielding Stats for Jose Munoz and Dan Norman
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 9 Innings
11
1.83
Dan Norman
Career
Per 9 Innings
107
1.4
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
0.83
Dan Norman
Career
Per 9 Innings
73
0.96
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
4.5
Dan Norman
Career
Per 9 Innings
154
2.02
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
4.17
Dan Norman
Career
Per 9 Innings
151
1.98
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.59
92.59
Dan Norman
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.05
98.05
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.273
2.273
Dan Norman
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.411
1.411
Jose Munoz
Career
Per 9 Innings
45.45
45.45
Dan Norman
Career
Per 9 Innings
68.22
68.22