Ralph Mitterling vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Ralph Mitterling. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .368) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .214). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ralph Mitterling and Jim Smith
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
13
185.71
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
150
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
42
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.393
0.393
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
1.31
18.68
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
9
128.57
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
2
300
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.154
0.154
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.135
0.135
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
1.16
16.59
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ralph Mitterling and Jim Smith
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 9 Innings
17
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.44
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ralph Mitterling
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.417
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5