Ed Miller vs. Jamie Nelson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jamie Nelson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Miller. Jamie Nelson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.597 vs .530) and on-base percentage (.315 vs .280). Ed Miller had the advantage in batting average (.250 vs .219). By the career numbers, Jamie Nelson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Miller and Jamie Nelson
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
25
600
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
111
600
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.219
0.219
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.54
0.54
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.643
0.643
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.309
0.309
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.281
0.281
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.189
0.189
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.209
0.209
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
0.389
0.389
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.557
0.557
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
2.15
51.67
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
9.58
51.79
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
9.25
9.25
Ed Miller
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 600 PA
2
10.81
Fielding Stats for Ed Miller and Jamie Nelson
Ed Miller
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.11
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
39
1.21
Ed Miller
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.8
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
223
6.94
Ed Miller
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.11
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
218
6.79
Ed Miller
Career
Per 9 Innings
61.54
61.54
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.76
97.76
Ed Miller
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jamie Nelson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.59
5.59