Chick Meade vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Hal Quick posted the stronger offensive profile against Chick Meade. Hal Quick posted stronger numbers in OPS (.547 vs .347) and on-base percentage (.279 vs .158). By the career numbers, Hal Quick had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Chick Meade and Hal Quick
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.094
0.094
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.158
0.158
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.189
0.189
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.094
0.094
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.024
0.024
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.118
0.118
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0.65
6.45
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
3.12
43.54
Chick Meade
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
27.91
Fielding Stats for Chick Meade and Hal Quick
Chick Meade
Career
Per 9 Innings
16
1.05
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Chick Meade
Career
Per 9 Innings
51
3.35
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
51
Chick Meade
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.44
94.44
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73
Chick Meade
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.188
3.188
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.1