Charlie Mead vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Charlie Mead. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .617) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .299). Charlie Mead had the advantage in home run production (3 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Charlie Mead and Jim Smith
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
0.245
0.245
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
0.645
0.645
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
25.12
52.71
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
0.299
0.299
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
0.073
0.073
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
0.525
0.525
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
27.92
58.57
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
11.92
11.92
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 600 PA
5
10.49
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Charlie Mead and Jim Smith
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 9 Innings
71
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 9 Innings
156
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Charlie Mead
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.5
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100