George McNamara vs. Mel Ott — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Mel Ott posted the stronger offensive profile against George McNamara. Mel Ott posted stronger numbers in OPS (.947 vs .606) and on-base percentage (.414 vs .333). By the career numbers, Mel Ott had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for George McNamara and Mel Ott
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
3
150
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
2730
144.48
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
11337
600
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.304
0.304
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.948
0.948
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
1.02
51.16
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
2152.13
113.9
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
4
200
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
4648
245.99
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.414
0.414
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.533
0.533
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
0.32
0.32
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
1.036
1.036
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
4
200
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
3208
169.78
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
1.34
66.8
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
2188.26
115.81
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
12.65
12.65
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
1.91
1.91
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Mel Ott
Career
Per 600 PA
82
4.34
Fielding Stats for George McNamara and Mel Ott
George McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Mel Ott
Career
Per 9 Innings
2575
George McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Mel Ott
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.42