George McNamara vs. Al Nevin — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, George McNamara posted the stronger offensive profile against Al Nevin. George McNamara posted stronger numbers in OPS (.606 vs .505) and on-base percentage (.333 vs .214). Al Nevin had the advantage in slugging (.291 vs .273). By the career numbers, George McNamara had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for George McNamara and Al Nevin
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
56
600
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.625
0.625
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.509
0.509
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
1.02
51.16
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
3.22
34.49
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.291
0.291
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.218
0.218
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.169
0.169
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.378
0.378
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
1.34
66.8
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
3.22
34.49
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
6
6
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
14
14
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
George McNamara
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Al Nevin
Career
Per 600 PA
1
10.71
Fielding Stats for George McNamara and Al Nevin
George McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.24
George McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
57.63
57.63
George McNamara
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Al Nevin
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.429
2.429