Jim McManus vs. Dixie Parker — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McManus posted the stronger offensive profile against Dixie Parker. Jim McManus posted stronger numbers in OPS (.896 vs .400) and on-base percentage (.357 vs .200). By the career numbers, Jim McManus had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McManus and Dixie Parker
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
5
600
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.893
0.893
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
2.13
91.49
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
21.64
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.539
0.539
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.295
0.295
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
0.8
0.8
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
2.23
95.49
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
21.95
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
7
7
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Jim McManus
Career
Per 600 PA
1
42.86
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McManus and Dixie Parker
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
10
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Jim McManus
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
50