Jim McLeod vs. Matt Young — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim McLeod and Matt Young are closely matched on the surface stats. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in slugging (.237 vs .224) and batting average (.203 vs .190). Matt Young had the advantage in on-base percentage (.254 vs .248). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Matt Young
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.492
0.492
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
16
152.38
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.254
0.254
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.224
0.224
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.375
0.375
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
3.24
30.83
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
4.2
4.2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.27
0.27
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Matt Young
Career
Per 600 PA
1
9.52
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Matt Young
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Matt Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
1.48
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Matt Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442
Matt Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.35
1.35