Jim McLeod vs. Ed Young — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Young posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Ed Young posted stronger numbers in OPS (.748 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.338 vs .248). By the career numbers, Ed Young had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Ed Young
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.301
0.301
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.338
0.338
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.13
0.13
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
0.726
0.726
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
104.56
86.18
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
182
182
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
12.75
12.75
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
1
0.82
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
20
16.48
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Ed Young
Career
Per 600 PA
90
90
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Ed Young
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
186
1.12
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
1620
9.78
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Ed Young
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.6
96.6