Jim McLeod vs. Luke Urban — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Luke Urban posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Luke Urban posted stronger numbers in OPS (.613 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.301 vs .248). By the career numbers, Luke Urban had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Luke Urban
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
135
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.632
0.632
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
40
177.78
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.301
0.301
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.313
0.313
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.039
0.039
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.495
0.495
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
14.39
63.97
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
19.29
19.29
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
0.43
0.43
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
1
4.44
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Luke Urban
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Luke Urban
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Luke Urban
Career
Per 9 Innings
44
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Luke Urban
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.5