Jim McLeod vs. Z. H. Taylor — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Z. H. Taylor posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Z. H. Taylor posted stronger numbers in OPS (.500 vs .485) and slugging (.250 vs .237). By the career numbers, Z. H. Taylor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Z. H. Taylor
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
48
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
2.72
34.02
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
3.6
45.06
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
48
48
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Z. H. Taylor
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
0.93
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 9 Innings
185
13.21
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 9 Innings
169
12.07
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Z. H. Taylor
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.35
91.35