Jim McLeod vs. Hiram Tanner — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Hiram Tanner. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .214) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .214). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Hiram Tanner
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.321
0.321
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
3
128.57
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.096
0.096
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
40
83.04
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
4
171.43
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Hiram Tanner
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.29
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
4.82
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 9 Innings
15
4.82
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442
Hiram Tanner
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.75
3.75