Jim McLeod vs. Ed Stone — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Stone posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Ed Stone posted stronger numbers in OPS (.855 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.390 vs .248). By the career numbers, Ed Stone had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Ed Stone
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.312
0.312
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.869
0.869
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.39
0.39
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.465
0.465
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.153
0.153
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.882
0.882
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
297.97
106.54
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
152.55
152.55
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
16.64
16.64
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
24
8.58
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Ed Stone
Career
Per 600 PA
91.67
91.67
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Ed Stone
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Ed Stone
Career
Per 9 Innings
409
1.12
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Ed Stone
Career
Per 9 Innings
670
1.84
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Ed Stone
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.44
95.44
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442
Ed Stone
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.638
1.638