Jim McLeod vs. Al Stokes — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim McLeod and Al Stokes are closely matched on the surface stats. Al Stokes posted stronger numbers in OPS (.508 vs .485) and slugging (.261 vs .237). Jim McLeod had the advantage in batting average (.203 vs .181). By the career numbers, Al Stokes had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Al Stokes
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.181
0.181
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.53
0.53
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.28
0.28
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.247
0.247
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.261
0.261
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.08
0.08
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.176
0.176
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
38.27
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
4.19
4.19
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Al Stokes
Career
Per 600 PA
0.33
0.33
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Al Stokes
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Al Stokes
Career
Per 9 Innings
46
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Al Stokes
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.58