Jim McLeod vs. Matt Stark — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Matt Stark. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .421) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .207). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Matt Stark
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.179
0.179
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.45
0.45
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.207
0.207
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.036
0.036
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.147
0.147
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
0.17
0.17
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Matt Stark
Career
Per 600 PA
4
80
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Matt Stark
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Matt Stark
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.55
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Matt Stark
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
8.07
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Matt Stark
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100